<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ogilvie and Almaraz, en banc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/</link>
	<description>[free California workers&#039; compensation resources]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EVEN More Workers Compensation Calculators &#124; PDRater - permanent disability calculator</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-4760</link>
		<dc:creator>EVEN More Workers Compensation Calculators &#124; PDRater - permanent disability calculator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-4760</guid>
		<description>[...] instance, my wildly popular Ogilvie calculator was available to beta testers just days after the Ogilvie case came [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] instance, my wildly popular Ogilvie calculator was available to beta testers just days after the Ogilvie case came [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogilvie: You&#8217;re working too hard &#124; PDRater - permanent disability calculator</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-4648</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogilvie: You&#8217;re working too hard &#124; PDRater - permanent disability calculator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-4648</guid>
		<description>[...] for peer review.  I&#8217;ve only received positive feedback.[2]  I&#8217;m offering the above Ogilvie Adjustment Chart to the public after a lot of testing by myself and other workers&#8217; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for peer review.  I&#8217;ve only received positive feedback.[2]  I&#8217;m offering the above Ogilvie Adjustment Chart to the public after a lot of testing by myself and other workers&#8217; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogilvie: the finger pointing begins &#124; PDRater - permanent disability calculator</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-4639</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogilvie: the finger pointing begins &#124; PDRater - permanent disability calculator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-4639</guid>
		<description>[...] not like CAAA wouldn&#8217;t have found out about Ogilvie if it wasn&#8217;t for Jay Shergill mentioning it in a blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not like CAAA wouldn&#8217;t have found out about Ogilvie if it wasn&#8217;t for Jay Shergill mentioning it in a blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogilvie, Almaraz/Guzman Amicus Briefs &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogilvie, Almaraz/Guzman Amicus Briefs &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>[...] to our friends at AppealsBoardReporter.com, we now have access to 22 amicus briefs filed in the Ogilvie and Almaraz/Guzman cases. [1] In late March 2009 the WCAB granted reconsideration of their recent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to our friends at AppealsBoardReporter.com, we now have access to 22 amicus briefs filed in the Ogilvie and Almaraz/Guzman cases. [1] In late March 2009 the WCAB granted reconsideration of their recent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogilvie, Almaraz, &#38; Guzman: Reconsideration Granted! Amicus Briefs Allowed! &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogilvie, Almaraz, &#38; Guzman: Reconsideration Granted! Amicus Briefs Allowed! &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-711</guid>
		<description>[...] the WCAB issued three Orders Granting Reconsideration and Order Allowing Amicus Briefs (en banc) in Ogilvie and Almaraz/Guzman.  For your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the WCAB issued three Orders Granting Reconsideration and Order Allowing Amicus Briefs (en banc) in Ogilvie and Almaraz/Guzman.  For your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Improve the Ogilvie Calculator! &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Improve the Ogilvie Calculator! &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-569</guid>
		<description>[...] it possible to get an Ogilvie DFEC adjusted whole person impairment above [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it possible to get an Ogilvie DFEC adjusted whole person impairment above [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almaraz/Guzman, Ogilvie, and the 24.4% rate increase &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Almaraz/Guzman, Ogilvie, and the 24.4% rate increase &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-560</guid>
		<description>[...] increase of 24.4% (down from a recommended 27% increase) was apparently in response to the recent Almaraz/Guzman and Ogilvie en banc decisions and a letter from the Governor&#8217;s office &#8220;expressing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increase of 24.4% (down from a recommended 27% increase) was apparently in response to the recent Almaraz/Guzman and Ogilvie en banc decisions and a letter from the Governor&#8217;s office &#8220;expressing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Almaraz/Guzman changed workers&#8217; compensation? &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>How Almaraz/Guzman changed workers&#8217; compensation? &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-537</guid>
		<description>[...] Almaraz/Guzman has been a boon to the U.S. Postal Service.  I&#8217;ve been receiving [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Almaraz/Guzman has been a boon to the U.S. Postal Service.  I&#8217;ve been receiving [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 500 Registered Users! &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>500 Registered Users! &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-483</guid>
		<description>[...] Ogilvie v. WCAB (en banc) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ogilvie v. WCAB (en banc) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith v. WCAB (California Youth Authority) - Oral Arugment 4-7-2009 &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith v. WCAB (California Youth Authority) - Oral Arugment 4-7-2009 &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-460</guid>
		<description>[...] when you thought things couldn&#8217;t get any crazier in workers&#8217; compensation than Ogilvie, Almaraz/Guzman, Benson, and XyzzxSJO2.  Yesterday I found out that on April 7, 2009 the case of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when you thought things couldn&#8217;t get any crazier in workers&#8217; compensation than Ogilvie, Almaraz/Guzman, Benson, and XyzzxSJO2.  Yesterday I found out that on April 7, 2009 the case of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Believe The Hype: Almaraz/Guzman is the law! &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Believe The Hype: Almaraz/Guzman is the law! &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-445</guid>
		<description>[...] are numerous workers&#8217; compensation professionals who are increidbly unhappy with Ogilvie and Almaraz/Guzman.  Vocational experts are unhappy with Ogilvie, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are numerous workers&#8217; compensation professionals who are increidbly unhappy with Ogilvie and Almaraz/Guzman.  Vocational experts are unhappy with Ogilvie, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New PDRater.com Record! &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>New PDRater.com Record! &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-370</guid>
		<description>[...] compensation resources, workers&#8217; compensation calculators, and updates regarding recent workers&#8217; compensation cases.  The vast majority of website visitors (I&#8217;m extrapolating from those who have signed up for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] compensation resources, workers&#8217; compensation calculators, and updates regarding recent workers&#8217; compensation cases.  The vast majority of website visitors (I&#8217;m extrapolating from those who have signed up for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How does Ogilvie change 2005 ratings? &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>How does Ogilvie change 2005 ratings? &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-298</guid>
		<description>[...] were discussing the impacts of Ogilvie on 2005 schedule ratings.  He had asked me whether I intended to update the 2005 permanent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were discussing the impacts of Ogilvie on 2005 schedule ratings.  He had asked me whether I intended to update the 2005 permanent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 400 Registered Users! &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>400 Registered Users! &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-270</guid>
		<description>[...] Ogilvie, Almarez/Guzman, and Benson came down. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ogilvie, Almarez/Guzman, and Benson came down. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benson v. WCAB and The Permanente Medical Group, affirmed! &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Benson v. WCAB and The Permanente Medical Group, affirmed! &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-257</guid>
		<description>[...] Ogilvie and Almaraz/Guzman, now Benson?  Its been an exciting two weeks to be a Workers&#8217; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ogilvie and Almaraz/Guzman, now Benson?  Its been an exciting two weeks to be a Workers&#8217; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogilvie DFEC Rebuttal Calculator - Ask for access &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogilvie DFEC Rebuttal Calculator - Ask for access &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-255</guid>
		<description>[...] going to delay the launch of the Ogilvie DFEC rebuttal calculator for a day or two. [1]  I believe it works just fine, but I would like to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to delay the launch of the Ogilvie DFEC rebuttal calculator for a day or two. [1]  I believe it works just fine, but I would like to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Calculator: Ogilvie DFEC Rebuttal Calculator - Ready for testing! &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>New Calculator: Ogilvie DFEC Rebuttal Calculator - Ready for testing! &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=1975#comment-251</guid>
		<description>[...] today I installed an Ogilvie v. City and County of SF DFEC Rebuttal calculator into the free workers&#8217; compensation calculators page on this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today I installed an Ogilvie v. City and County of SF DFEC Rebuttal calculator into the free workers&#8217; compensation calculators page on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

