<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smith v. WCAB (California Youth Authority) &#8211; Oral Arugment 4-7-2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pdrater.com/2009/03/smith-v-wcab-california-youth-authority-amar-v-wcab-mel-clayton-ford-oral-arugment-4-7-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/03/smith-v-wcab-california-youth-authority-amar-v-wcab-mel-clayton-ford-oral-arugment-4-7-2009/</link>
	<description>[free California workers&#039; compensation resources]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writ Granted on Almarez/Guzman! &#124; PDRater - permanent disability calculator</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/03/smith-v-wcab-california-youth-authority-amar-v-wcab-mel-clayton-ford-oral-arugment-4-7-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9478</link>
		<dc:creator>Writ Granted on Almarez/Guzman! &#124; PDRater - permanent disability calculator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=2522#comment-9478</guid>
		<description>[...] granting of a Writ of Review to to Order after oral argument was about four months.  In that case (Rollick) the Court of Appeals had basically already made up their minds about the issues and had allotted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] granting of a Writ of Review to to Order after oral argument was about four months.  In that case (Rollick) the Court of Appeals had basically already made up their minds about the issues and had allotted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith/Amar Unanimously Reversed! &#124; PDRater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/03/smith-v-wcab-california-youth-authority-amar-v-wcab-mel-clayton-ford-oral-arugment-4-7-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith/Amar Unanimously Reversed! &#124; PDRater.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=2522#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>[...] Youth Authority) went forward on Smith out that on April 7, 2009.  Today, we have the result - Smith/Amar has been unanimously reversed by the California Supreme Court in case number S150528.  Download a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Youth Authority) went forward on Smith out that on April 7, 2009.  Today, we have the result &#8211; Smith/Amar has been unanimously reversed by the California Supreme Court in case number S150528.  Download a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

