<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Ogilvie Calculator Feature!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pdrater.com/2009/06/new-ogilvie-calculator-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/06/new-ogilvie-calculator-feature/</link>
	<description>[free California workers&#039; compensation resources]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOS</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/06/new-ogilvie-calculator-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-16841</link>
		<dc:creator>KOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=3007#comment-16841</guid>
		<description>Any new developments on whether it is applicable to each body part or once per injury? Thanks, Jay~!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any new developments on whether it is applicable to each body part or once per injury? Thanks, Jay~!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Shergill</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/06/new-ogilvie-calculator-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-8256</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Shergill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=3007#comment-8256</guid>
		<description>Excellent question!  A strict interpretation of Ogilvie dictates a separate DFEC analysis for every rating string.  Some are arguing that the DFEC analysis is only applied once per injury.  However, I&#039;ve yet to see relevant case law, statute, or persuasive reasoning on this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent question!  A strict interpretation of Ogilvie dictates a separate DFEC analysis for every rating string.  Some are arguing that the DFEC analysis is only applied once per injury.  However, I&#8217;ve yet to see relevant case law, statute, or persuasive reasoning on this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wowand135</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/06/new-ogilvie-calculator-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-8255</link>
		<dc:creator>wowand135</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=3007#comment-8255</guid>
		<description>What about for multiple body parts with different FEC ranks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about for multiple body parts with different FEC ranks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gizzip</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/06/new-ogilvie-calculator-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-6756</link>
		<dc:creator>gizzip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=3007#comment-6756</guid>
		<description>Does that include fringe benefits, such as vacation check, pension or annuity. For example a Ironworker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that include fringe benefits, such as vacation check, pension or annuity. For example a Ironworker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Shergill</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/06/new-ogilvie-calculator-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-4625</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Shergill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=3007#comment-4625</guid>
		<description>Hi Crystal,
While the WCAB in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ogilvie&lt;/a&gt; isn&#039;t exactly clear on this point, their example calculations appear to use a total of all earnings over the preceding three years.
But, this is just one man&#039;s reading of the case.
Regards,
Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Crystal,<br />
While the WCAB in <a href="http://www.pdrater.com/2009/02/ogilvie-and-almaraz-en-banc/" rel="nofollow">Ogilvie</a> isn&#8217;t exactly clear on this point, their example calculations appear to use a total of all earnings over the preceding three years.<br />
But, this is just one man&#8217;s reading of the case.<br />
Regards,<br />
Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crystal</title>
		<link>http://www.pdrater.com/2009/06/new-ogilvie-calculator-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-4624</link>
		<dc:creator>crystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdrater.com/?p=3007#comment-4624</guid>
		<description>Is the post injury earnings the annual earnings or the 3 year aggregate? Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the post injury earnings the annual earnings or the 3 year aggregate? Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

