### Ogilvie Calculations Made Dead Simple

**UPDATE: DOWNLOAD THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF AS A PDF!**

Get ready to stop paying people to do Ogilvie calculations, recycle your Gearheart/Gerlach handouts, and delete your Frost Excel spreadsheet.1 We’re about to go all “Beautiful Mind.”

Yesterday while at the Oakland WCAB an Applicant’s attorney mentioned he noticed an interesting trend in the Ogilvie formula. 23 He said that whenever he does an Ogilvie calculation for someone with a 100% earnings loss and a modest WPI, the WPI is always increased by 18. 4

I ran a number of test calculations on this theory and it *appeared* to be right. My calculations show that up to a WPI of 44 the increase *appears* to always be 18.1, but the last “0.1” always gets rounded down. However, *appearing* to be right just isn’t good enough for me. And, because I am just truly that nerd, here’s the fully mathematical proof:

Let’s break down the calculations at the heart of Ogilvie:

- Earnings Loss56
- = (PIESSE – PIEA) / PIESSE
- = ($1.00 – $0.00) / $1.00
- = $1.00 / $1.00
- = 1
- = 100%

- Individualized Proportional Earnings Loss
- = (WPI / Earnings Loss) / 100
- = (WPI / 100% )/100
- = (WPI / 1) / 100
- = WPI / 100
- Thus, for any WPI less than 45 and a total loss of earnings, the Individualized Earnings Loss will always be less than 0.450 in Table A.

- DFEC Adjustment Factor
- = ([1.81/a] * .1) + 1
- = ( (1.81 * .1)/a) + 1
- = (.181/a) + 1
- = 1 + (.181/a)

- Ogilvie DFEC Adjusted Rating
- = WPI * DFEC Adjustment Factor
- = WPI * (1 + (.181/a) )
- = WPI * (1 + (.181 / Individualized Proportional Earnings Loss) )
- = WPI * (1 + (.181 / (WPI / 100) ) )
- = WPI * (1 + (.181 * 100 / WPI ) )
- = WPI * (1 + (18.1/ WPI ) )
- = WPI * ( (WPI/WPI) + (18.1/ WPI ) )
- = WPI * (WPI + 18.1/ WPI )
- = WPI * (WPI + 18.1/ WPI )
- = WPI + 18.1

- Conclusion
- If you have an Applicant with a 100% post injury earnings loss and a WPI of 44 or less, you should rebut the FEC and arrive at an adjusted WPI that is equal to the original WPI plus 18.1.

Therefore, I propose a new Ogilvie formula that will be easy for anyone to remember:

**Step 1:**If the injured worker has a 100% earnings loss and a WPI of 44 or less, add 18.1 to the WPI and round down.**Step 2:**If the injured worker has less than 100% earnings loss or a WPI of 45 or higher, go to Step 3.**Step 3:**For*heaven’s sake*, just make your life easier and use the calculators here at PDRater.com.

What do you think? Leave a comment or drop me a line.

- Sorry Jeff, Mark, Mark, and Ray! [↩]
- Thank you “S”! Unfortunately, he did not want to be named. [↩]
- Man, I *wish* I could take credit for this observation. [↩]
- Not multiplied by 18, but an addition of 18. [↩]
- PIESSE = Post Injury Earnings of Similarly Situated Employees [↩]
- PIEA = Post Injury Earnings of Applicant [↩]

## 5 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

## Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

[…] called me up yesterday to say (I’m paraphrasing here), “You jackass. Thanks to your Ogilvie proof every Applicant’s attorney I know is calling me up, gloating, and asking for 18 points on top […]

[…] don’t have to be a math geek to appreciate my recent post on the Ogilvie adjustment formula. [1] If you’re using my Ogilvie calculator for situations involving a 100% earnings loss, […]

[…] v. WCAB II: The WCAB ruled the original Ogilvie (I) formula is still valid. The WCAB appears to have created a right to reopen a case for […]

[…] WCAB ruled the original Ogilvie (I) formula is still […]

[…] the Ogilvie/DFEC analysis on each rating […]