PDRater – PD calculators

You'd have to know the theme song to really get it...

You’ll understand the title in just a moment…

For the last few months my laptop has been in bad shape.  Such bad shape I’ve been using a backup laptop. [1]  Something on my laptop’s motherboard went bad and killed the battery. [2][3]  I could still use it – but I had to keep it plugged in all the time.  If I needed to move it, I had to shut it down all the way, move it, then boot it up – since it had no battery life at all.

Well, Dell’s kick ass incredible customer service took care of me – once again.  I can’t thank these guys enough for going above and beyond.  I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, my next laptop is going to be a Dell. Thanks to Lionel my laptop is sporting a totally brand-spanking new motherboard and power cord.  I’ve also just slapped in a totally new battery as well.

Anyhow, I’m beyond happy. [4]

1. Trust me, the back up laptop is nothing to brag about. [↩]
2. You see, the motherboard – it went bad.  It was one bad mother…  Oh, forget it. [↩]
3. The photo does not belong to me and is probably the property of MGM. [↩]
4. Yes, yes, I’m a nerd – whatever. [↩]

Ye olde cell fone

Here’s some trivia for you.  I have the world’s crappiest cell phone.  I get a lot of flack for my cell phone.  It’s beat to hell, got a cracked screen, dented, scratched, and it’s ridiculously old.

How old?  Well, March 15 will be the six year anniversary of the FCC’s acceptance.  My cell carrier has been sending me ever more frantic flyers for the latest cell phones for about four years now.  It’s gotten pretty pathetic, really.

Unfortunately my trusty phone is now taking it’s last gasps and I need to find a replacement.  :(

Anyone want to kick the tires?

I’m working on a new calculator and I could use some beta testers. [1]

If you’re interested, leave a comment or send me an e-mail.

Thanks!

1. Photo courtesy of CaptPiper [↩]

Antivirus Pro 2010 SCAM

My father in law’s laptop is infected with a very nasty program called “Antivirus Pro 2010.”  It disables a bunch of core Windows functions, messes with other programs, shuts down the computer randomly, tells you the computer has a virus (which is technically true), and then offers to help you out for $40.00.  In reality, this program is itself malware/spyware etc.

The problem is that it really looks like its an official MicroSoft or Windows program! [1]

After several attempts and trying to use numerous different programs, I’ve been unsuccessful in deleting it.  It installs pieces of itself all over the computer – and if you don’t delete each piece it will install the entire thing all over again.  The various recommendations I’ve seen on the internet have been ineffectual.

If When I finally remove it, I’ll post the information here.

1. Photo courtesy of bleepingcomputer.com [↩]

Back to the drawing board

DOWNLOAD THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF AS A PDF!

A little while ago William S. Morris, an Applicant’s attorney, told me that the Ogilvie adjustment calculation could be further simplified. [1] He suggested the following[2] :

1. Earnings Loss[3][4]
   1. L = (PIESSE – PIEA) / PIESSE
2. Individualized Proportional Earnings Loss
   1. = (WPI / L) / 100
3. DFEC Adjustment Factor
   1. = ([1.81/a] * .1) + 1
   2. = ( (1.81 * .1)/a) + 1
   3. = (.181/a) + 1
   4. = 1 + (.181/a)
4. Ogilvie DFEC Adjusted Rating
   1. = WPI * DFEC Adjustment Factor
   2. = WPI * (1 + (.181/a) )
   3. = WPI * (1 + (.181 / Individualized Proportional Earnings Loss) )
   4. = WPI * (1 + (.181 / ( (WPI / L) / 100) ) )
   5. = WPI * (1 + (18.1 / ( (WPI / L)  ) )
   6. = WPI * (1 + (18.1 * (L/WPI) ) )
   7. = WPI + (18.1 * L)
5. Conclusion
   1. If the injured workers’ individualized proportional earnings loss is outside all of the FEC ranks, you may calculate the Ogilvie adjustment by adding (18.1*Earnings Loss) to the WPI.

The only flaw with the proofs offered by William and myself is that they are too exact.  The WCAB in Ogilvie never sets forth the exact process for performing the Ogilvie adjustment calculation – so the only official method involves rounding to different significant figures at different places.  Thus, a calculation performed in strict accordance with the WCAB in Ogilvie and through one of these mathematical proofs would differ very slightly.

What do you think? Leave a comment or drop me a line.

1. Photo courtesy of Dahveed76 [↩]
2. I’m paraphrasing here [↩]
3. PIESSE = Post Injury Earnings of Similarly Situated Employees [↩]
4. PIEA = Post Injury Earnings of Applicant [↩]